User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.2; N8800 Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/43.0.2357.92 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone-2.yml
Chrome Mobile 43.0.2357.92Android 4.2.2Blink StarN8800smartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 43.0Blink Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.112 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 43.0.2357.92closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 43.0.2357.92closeAndroid 4.2.2KingelonN8800mobile-browseryescloseclose0.28603 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 43.0Blink Android 4.2StarN8800smartphoneyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 43.0.2357.92closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 43.0.2357closeAndroid 4.2.2N8800closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.043 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 43.0.2357.92WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 43Blink Android 4.2.2N8800mobile:smartyescloseclose0.13101 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 43.0.2357.92closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 43closeAndroid 4.2KingelonN8800Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.039 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:29 | by ThaDafinser