User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Konqueror/4.5; Linux) KHTML/4.5.5 (like Gecko) Kubuntu
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-linux.yaml
Konqueror 4.5Kubuntu KHTML 4.5.5desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Konqueror 4.5KHTML 4.5Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.032 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Konqueror 4.5closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Konqueror 4.5KHTML Kubuntu desktop0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Konqueror 4.5;closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Konqueror 4.5closeKubuntu closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Konqueror 4.5closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.04501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Konqueror 4.5 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Konqueror 4.5KHTML 4.5.5Kubuntu desktopcloseclose0.013 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:29 | by ThaDafinser