User agent detail

Opera%20Coast/4.00.86810 CFNetwork/711.1.16 Darwin/14.0.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-618.php
Coast 4.0iOS 8.1unknown Applegeneral Mobile DeviceMobile Deviceyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Coast 4.0WebKit iOS 8.1AppleMobile Deviceyesyes0.013 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Coast by Opera 4.00.86810closeiOS 8.1.1mobile-browseryescloseclose0.21302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
iOS 8.1yes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 4.00.86810close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
CFNetwork 711.1.16closeiOS 8.1Applecloseclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 4.00.86810closeDarwin closecloseclosecloseclose0.06201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera Darwin closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.45305 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Coast by Opera 4.00.86810 iOS 8.1.1mobile:smartyescloseclose0.009 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
FaceBook on iOS 8.1.2closeiOS 8.1.2AppleiPhoneSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:29 | by ThaDafinser