User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux armv7l; xx; rv:1.9.2a1pre) Gecko/20090928 Firefox/3.5 Maemo Browser 1.4.1.21 RX-51 N900
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-maemo.yaml
MicroB 1.4.1Maemo Gecko 1.9.2a1NokiaN900mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox Gecko Linux Smartphone OS Mobile Phoneyes0.066 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 3.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 3.5closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
MicroB 1.4Gecko Maemo NokiaN900tabletyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 3.5closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Maemo Browser 1.4.1closeMaemo closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Maemo Browser 1.4.1.21closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.26203 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 3.5Gecko 20090928Maemo closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.51805 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
MicroB 1.4.1Gecko 1.9.2a1Maemo NokiaN900mobile:smartyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 3.5closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Firefox 3.5closeLinux armv7l NokiaN900Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:29 | by ThaDafinser