User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 6_0_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/536.26 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile/10A525 [Pinterest/iOS]
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-765.php
Pinterest App 0.0iOS 6.0unknown AppleiPhoneMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Pinterest App WebKit iOS 6.0AppleiPhoneMobile Phoneyesyes0.034 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 536.26closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari closeiOS 6.0.1AppleiPhonemobile-browseryescloseclose0.20502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Mobile Safari WebKit iOS 6.0AppleiPhonesmartphoneyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0closeiOS 6.0.1closeiPhonecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Pinterest closeiOS 6.0.1AppleiPhonecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeiPhone OS 6.0.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.046 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Pinterest Bot WebKit 536.26iOS 6.0.1AppleiPhonecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesPinterestclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Webview closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Mobile Safari 6.0closeiOS AppleiPhoneSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:28 | by ThaDafinser