User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Java; U; ru; samsung-s5610) UCBrowser8.3.0.154/69/444/UCWEB Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Samsungs5610 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesGeneral CrawlersBot/Crawler0.062 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser close mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 8.3 Samsungs5610smartphoneyes0.013 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.3.0close Samsungs5610closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser close closecloseclosecloseclose0.07501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 8.3.0.154 Mobilecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 8.3Gecko Samsungs5610mobile:featureyescloseclose0.023 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 4.0Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.018 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:28 | by ThaDafinser