User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.2; K-8S Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/34.0.1847.131 YaBrowser/14.5.1847.18211.00 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
Yandex Browser 14.5Android 4.2unknown KeenerK-8STabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Yandex Browser 14.5Blink Android 4.2KeenerK-8STabletyesyes0.013 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 34.0.1847.131closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Yandex.Browser 14.5.1847.18211.00closeAndroid 4.2.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.30403 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Yandex Browser 14.5Blink Android 4.2yes0.011 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Yandex 14.5.1847.18211.00closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Yandex Browser 14.5.1847closeAndroid 4.2.2K-8Scloseclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
ABrowse closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.06401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Yandex Browser 14.5.1847.18211.0WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.43904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Yandex Browser 14.5Blink Android 4.2.2K-8Stabletyescloseclose0.10101 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 34.0.1847.131closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 42closeAndroid 4.2Tabletyesyescloseclose0.023 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:27 | by ThaDafinser