User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.2; A1-811 Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/35.0.1916.141 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-525.php
Chrome 35.0Android 4.2unknown AcerIconia ATabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 35.0Blink Android 4.2AcerIconia ATabletyesyes0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 35.0.1916.141closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 35.0.1916.141closeAndroid 4.2.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.28003 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 35.0Blink Android 4.2AcerIconia Atabletyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 35.0.1916.141closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 35.0.1916closeAndroid 4.2.2AcerA1-811closeclosecloseclose0 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.06501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 35.0.1916.141WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 35Blink Android 4.2.2AcerIconia A1-811tabletyescloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 35.0.1916.141closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 36closeAndroid 4.2AcerA1-811Tabletyesyescloseclose0.071 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:27 | by ThaDafinser