User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.1; Mi-510 Build/JOP40D) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/31.0.1650.59 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SpiceMi510 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 31.0Blink Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 31.0.1650.59closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 31.0.1650.59closeAndroid 4.2.1SpiceMi 510mobile-browseryescloseclose0.29203 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 31.0Blink Android 4.2smartphoneyes0.011 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 31.0.1650.59closeAndroid 4.2.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 31.0.1650closeAndroid 4.2.1SpiceMi510closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.05501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 31.0.1650.59WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 31Blink Android 4.2.1Mi-510mobile:smartyescloseclose0.16002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 31.0.1650.59closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 31closeAndroid 4.2SpiceMi 510Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.103 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:27 | by ThaDafinser