User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.28) Gecko/20130316 Nightingale/1.12.2 (20140112193149)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/mediaplayer.yml
Nightingale 1.12.2GNU/Linux desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Mozilla 1.9Gecko 1.9Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.036 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Mozilla rv:1.9.2.28closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.19002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nightingale 1.12 GNU/Linux desktop0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 1.9closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Mozilla 1.9.2.28closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.05201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 1.9.2.28Gecko 20130316Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.43904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Gecko 1.9.2Linux desktopcloseclose0.014 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:27 | by ThaDafinser