User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.2.1; zh-cn; EBEST S10 Build/JOP40D) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko)Version/4.0 MQQBrowser/6.1 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone.yml
QQ Browser 6.1Android 4.2.1WebKit EBESTS10smartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.029 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.2.1GenericAndroid 4.2mobile-browseryescloseclose0.31603 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
QQ Browser 6.1WebKit Android 4.2EBESTS10smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.2.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
QQ Browser Mobile 6.1closeAndroid 4.2.1EBEST S10closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.05101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
QQ Browser 6.1WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
QQ Browser 6.1Webkit 537.36Android 4.2.1EBEST S10mobile:smartyescloseclose0.12601 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.2closeAndroid 4.2Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.028 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:26 | by ThaDafinser