User agent detail

LG-KS20/TIM/V10b Browser/IEMobile/7.6 MMS/LG-MMS-WINCE-V1.0/1.2 Java/LGVM/1.0 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 (compatible; MSIE 4.01; Windows CE; PPC)/UC Browser7.7.1.88/31/444
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-365.php
UC Browser 7.7WinCE unknownunknown LGKS20Mobile Phoneyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 7.7Trident WinCE LGKS20Mobile Phoneyes0.029 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
IEMobile 7.6closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE Mobile 4.01closeWindows GenericWindows Mobilemobile-browseryescloseclose0.23102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 7.7 Windows CE LGKS20smartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 4.01closeWindows CEclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 7.7.1closeWindows CE LGKS20closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
IE Mobile 7.6closeWindows CE closecloseclosecloseclose0.06101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 7.7.1.88 Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 7.7Gecko Windows Mobile LGKS20mobile:smartyescloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 4.01closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE Mobile closeWindows Mobile Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:26 | by ThaDafinser