User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9.2; U; Edition Next; xx) Presto/2.11.310 Version/12.50
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-opera.yaml
Opera Next 12.50OS X Mavericks 10.9Presto 2.11.310desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 12.50Presto 2.12MacOSX 10.9AppleMacintoshDesktop0.01 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 12.50closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 12.50closeOS X 10.9.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.19302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Next 12.50Presto Mac 10.9desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 12.50closeOS X 10.9.2closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 12.50closeMac OS X 10.9.2closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 12.50closeOS X 10.9.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.048 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 12.50Presto 2.11.310Mac OS X 10.9.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Next 12.50Presto 2.11.310OS X Mavericks 10.9desktopcloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 12.50closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.16closeLinux x86_64 Desktopcloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:26 | by ThaDafinser