User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.1; ru-ru; Rooted Eris 2.1 v0.3 Build/ERD79) AppleWebKit/530.17 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/530.17
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
Android 4.0Android 2.1unknown HTCErisMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 2.1HTCErisMobile Phoneyesyes0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 2.1GenericAndroid 2.1mobile-browseryescloseclose0.28003 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 2.1yes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 2.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 2.1closeAndroid 2.1Rooted Eris 2.1 v0.3closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 2.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.06201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0WebKit 530.17Android 2.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 530.17Android 2.1Rooted Eris 2.1 v0.3mobile:smartyescloseclose0.13401 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 2.1closeAndroid 2.1Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.025 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:26 | by ThaDafinser