User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.4.4; SM-T560 Build/KTU84P) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/40.0.2214.109 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/tablet/manufacturer-samsung.yaml
Chrome 40Android 4.4.4Blink 537.36SamsungGalaxy Tab E 9.6tabletyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 40.0Blink Android 4.4Mobile Phoneyesyes0.043 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 40.0.2214.109closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 40.0.2214.109closeAndroid 4.4.4desktop-browsercloseclose0.25603 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 40.0Blink Android 4.4SamsungSM-T560tabletyes0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 40.0.2214.109closeAndroid 4.4.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 40.0.2214closeAndroid 4.4.4SamsungSM-T560closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.4.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.05201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 40.0.2214.109WebKit 537.36Android 4.4.4Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 40Blink Android 4.4.4SamsungGalaxy Tab E 9.6tabletyescloseclose0.05 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 40.0.2214.109closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 40closeAndroid 4.4SamsungSM-T560Tabletyesyescloseclose0.037 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:26 | by ThaDafinser