User agent detail

Bible 4.3.7 (LENOVO LIFETAB_E10312 LIFETAB_E10310;Android 4.2.2;de_DE;gzip)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LenovoLIFETAB_E10312 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Bible closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2LenovoLIFETAB E10312 LIFETAB E10310;Android 4.2.2;de DE;gzip)mobile-browseryescloseclose0.27903 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.2LenovoLIFETAB E10312smartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.2.2closeAndroid 4.2.2LenovoLIFETAB_E10312closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Stock Android Browser Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Android 4.2.2LenovoLIFETAB E10312 LIFETAB E10310;Android 4.2.2;de DE;gzip)mobile:smartyescloseclose0.17002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.2closeAndroid 4.2Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.055 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:25 | by ThaDafinser