User agent detail

Groupon/2.10.3166 (Android 4.1.2; Samsung Espresso10rf / Samsung GT-P5100; O2 - de)[preload=true;locale=de_DE;clientidbase=android-samsung]
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungEspresso10rf Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Groupon 2.10.3166closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid 4.1.2SamsungEspresso10rfmobile-browseryescloseclose0.27403 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.1O2GALAXY S IIsmartphoneyes0.013 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.1.2closeAndroid 4.1.2SamsungEspresso10rfcloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Stock Android Browser Android 4.1.2Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Groupon 2.10 Android 4.1.2SamsungGalaxy Tab 2 (10.1)tabletyescloseclose0.16802 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.1closeAndroid 4.1Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.046 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:25 | by ThaDafinser