User agent detail

JUC (Linux; U; 2.2.1; xx; GT-I9088; 480*800) UCWEB8.2.2.135/145/999
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/browser-uc.yaml
UC Browser 8.2Android 2.2.1 SamsungGalaxy Smobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 8.2WebKit Android Mobile Phoneyesyes0.012 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
JUC closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser closeLinux mobile-browseryescloseclose0.27603 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 8.2 GNU/Linux SamsungGALAXY Ssmartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.2.2closeAndroid 2.2.1SamsungGT-I9088closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 8.2.2.135closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.04601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 8.2.2.135 Linux Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 8.2 Android 2.2.1SamsungGalaxy Smobile:smartyescloseclose0.045 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.021 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:24 | by ThaDafinser