User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.1.2; TelePAD1030 Build/JZO54K) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/31.0.1650.59 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
XoroTelePAD1030 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 31.0Blink Android 4.1Mobile Phoneyesyes0.043 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 31.0.1650.59closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 31.0.1650.59closeAndroid 4.1.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.28003 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 31.0Blink Android 4.1tabletyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 31.0.1650.59closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 31.0.1650closeAndroid 4.1.2XoroTelePAD1030closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.05201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 31.0.1650.59WebKit 537.36Android 4.1.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 31Blink Android 4.1.2TelePAD1030tabletyescloseclose0.12001 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 31.0.1650.59closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.1closeAndroid 4.1Tabletyesyescloseclose0.048 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:24 | by ThaDafinser