User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.2; vivo Xplay Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/29.0.1547.59 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
vivoXplay Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 29.0Blink Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.021 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 29.0.1547.59closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 29.0.1547.59closeAndroid 4.2.2VivoXplaymobile-browseryescloseclose0.27603 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 29.0Blink Android 4.2VivoVivo Xplaysmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 29.0.1547.59closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 29.0.1547closeAndroid 4.2.2vivoXplaycloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.05201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 29.0.1547.59WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.49605 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 29Blink Android 4.2.2VivoXplaymobile:smartyescloseclose0.046 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 29.0.1547.59closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.2closeAndroid 4.2VivoXplaySmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.116 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:24 | by ThaDafinser