User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (Android 1.6.1.16-RT-20120926.152630; Linux; Opera Mobi/ADR-1201041826; U; xx) Presto/2.9.201 Version/11.50
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-aliyun.yaml
Opera Mobile 11.50Aliyun OS 1.6.1Presto 2.9.201mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 11.50Presto 2.9Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.01 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 11.50closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mobile 11.50closeAndroid OperaMobi for Androidmobile-browseryescloseclose0.18102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Mobile 11.50Presto Android 1.6smartphoneyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 11.50closeAndroid 1.6.1.16closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mobile 11.50closeAndroid 1.6.1closeclosecloseclose0.012 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera Mobile 11.50closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.15302 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 11.50Presto 2.9.201Android 1.6.1.16closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mobile 11.50Presto 2.9.201Aliyun OS 1.6.1mobile:smartyescloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 11.50closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera Mobile 11closeAndroid 1.6OperaMobi for AndroidFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:24 | by ThaDafinser