User agent detail

samsung-I9300/1.0 Linux/2.6.35.7 Android/4.0.4 Release/11.23.2012 Browser/AppleWebKit533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mozilla/5.0 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungI9300 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 4.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.025 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
samsung-I9300 1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid 4.0.4SamsungI9300mobile-browseryescloseclose0.29103 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.0SamsungI9300smartphoneyes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeAndroid 4.0.4SamsungI9300closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.05501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Webkit based browser WebKit Android closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 533.1Android 4.0.4SamsungI9300mobile:smartyescloseclose0.15302 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.0Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.046 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:24 | by ThaDafinser