User agent detail

SAMSUNG-GT-C6712/C6712DDKG1 SHP/VPP/R5 Dolfin/2.0 NexPlayer/3.0 SMM-MMS/1.2.0 profile/MIDP-2.1 configuration/CLDC-1.1 OPN-B
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-096.php
Dolfin 2.0JAVA unknownunknown SamsungGT-C6712Mobile Phoneyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Dolfin 2.0WebKit JAVA SamsungGT-C6712Mobile Phoneyes0.03 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SAMSUNG-GT-C6712 C6712DDKG1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Dolphin 2.0close SamsungGT-C6712mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
NexPlayer 3.0 SamsungGT-C6712smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Dolfin 2.0close SamsungGT-C6712closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Dolfin 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.04501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Dolfin 2.0 Touchwiz 3.0SamsungStar II Duosmobile:featureyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close SamsungGT-C6712Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:23 | by ThaDafinser