User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.2; U8 Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/28.0.1500.64 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
PipoU8 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 28.0Blink Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 28.0.1500.64closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 28.0.1500.64closeAndroid 4.2.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.30203 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 28.0Blink Android 4.2tabletyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 28.0.1500.64closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 28.0.1500closeAndroid 4.2.2PipoU8closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.05301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 28.0.1500.64WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 28Blink Series60 Sony EricssonVivaz Promobile:smartyescloseclose0.08701 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 28.0.1500.64closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 28closeAndroid 4.2HisenseU8Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.063 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:23 | by ThaDafinser