User agent detail

J-PHONE/4.0/J-T51/SNXXXXXXXXX000000000 TS/1.00 Profile/MIDP-1.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.0 Ext-Profile/JSCL-1.1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
woothee/woothee-testset
/testsets/mobilephone_softbank.yaml
SoftBank Mobile J-T51SoftBank mobilephone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
J-PHONE 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close ToshibaJ-T51mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
SoftbankJ-T51smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
No result found
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
ToshibaJ-T51mobile:featureyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
SoftBank Mobile J-T51closeclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close SoftbankJ-T51Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:22 | by ThaDafinser