User agent detail

Opera/9.7 (Windows Mobile; SHARP/WS007SH; PPC; 480x640; Opera Mobi/35166; U; xx) Presto/2.2.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-windowsmobile.yaml
Opera Mobile 9.7Windows Mobile Presto 2.2.1SharpW-ZERO3 WS007SHmobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mobile Presto 2.2WinMobile Mobile Deviceyes0.017 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 9.7closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mobile closeWindows OperaMobimobile-browseryescloseclose0.20002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 9.7Presto Windows Mobile SharpDynamic Racing 3smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 9.7close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mobile 9.7closeWindows Mobile closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera Mobile closeWindows Mobile closecloseclosecloseclose0.05201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 9.7Presto 2.2.1Windows Mobile closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mobile 9.7Presto 2.2.1Windows Mobile SharpW-ZERO3 [es] WS007SHmobile:smartyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 9.7closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera Mobile close OperaMobiFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.018 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:22 | by ThaDafinser