User agent detail

UCWEB/2.0 (Linux; U; Opera Mini/7.1.32052/30.3697; en-US; Celkon_A_63) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/9.1.1.420 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone.yml
Opera Mini 7.1.32052GNU/Linux Presto CelkonA 63smartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.1U2 Android Mobile Phoneyesyes0.009 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Minicloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser closeLinux mobile-browseryescloseclose0.27403 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Mini 7.1Presto GNU/Linux CelkonA 63smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera Mini 7.1.32052closeLinux closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mini 7.1.32052closeLinux CelkonA_63closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera Mini 7.1.32052closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.06001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.1.1.420 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.55005 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.1Gecko Android CelkonA63mobile:smartyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 4.0Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:21 | by ThaDafinser