User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Linux armv7l; Maemo; Opera Mobi/9; es-ES) Opera 11.00
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
Maemo Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Netscape 4.0Gecko Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.028 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Mobicloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mobile 11.00closeLinux NokiaGeneric Maemo with Fennecmobile-browseryescloseclose0.19502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 11.00Presto Maemo yes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 9;closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mobile 11.0closeMaemo closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera Mobile closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.04501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 11.0 Maemo closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mobile Maemo mobile:smartyescloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 8.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera Mobile closeLinux NokiaGeneric Maemo with FennecFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:21 | by ThaDafinser