User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (LG-C510 AppleWebKit/531 MMS/LG-MMS-V1.0/1.2 MediaPlayer/LGPlayer/1.0 Java/ASVM/1.1 Profile/MIDP-2.1),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LGC510 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesGeneral CrawlersBot/Crawler0.074 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 531closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close LGC510mobile-browseryescloseclose0.20302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Java LGC510smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close LGC510closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
close closeclosecloseclosecloseyesJavaCrawler0.049 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
5.0WebKit 531 LGLGC510closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 531 LGC510mobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.025 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:20 | by ThaDafinser