User agent detail

UCWEB/2.0 (Java; U; MIDP-2.0; 11; GT-S5230) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser UCVN.MOBI/9.4.1.377 U2/1.0.0 Mobile UNTRUSTED/1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungGT-S5230 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesGeneral CrawlersBot/Crawler0.017 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
UCWEB 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser close GenericJ2ME Midletmobile-browseryescloseclose0.28903 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser SamsungGT-S5230smartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close SamsungGT-S5230closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.04901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 2.0 SamsungMobilecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser Gecko mobile:featureyescloseclose0.051 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 4.0Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:20 | by ThaDafinser