User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (iPod; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_5 like Mac OS X; en-US) AppleWebKit/534.12 (KHTML, like Gecko) Puffin/1.3.3102MS Mobile Safari/534.12
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-876.php
Puffin 1.3iOS 4.3unknown AppleiPod TouchMobile Deviceyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Puffin 1.3WebKit iOS 4.3AppleiPod TouchMobile Deviceyesyes0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 534.12closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari closeiOS 4.3.5AppleiPod Touchmobile-browseryescloseclose0.18902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Puffin 1.3WebKit iOS 4.3AppleiPod Touchportable media playeryes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari closeiOS 4.3.5closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Puffin 1.3.3102closeiOS 4.3.5AppleiPodcloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeiPhone OS 4.3.5closecloseclosecloseclose0.06201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Puffin 1.3.3102MWebKit 534.12 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Puffin 1.3Webkit 534.12iOS 4.3.5AppleiPod touchmediayescloseclose0.002 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Mobile Safari 4.3.5closeiOS 4.3.5AppleiPod TouchOther Mobileyesyescloseclose0.019 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:20 | by ThaDafinser