User agent detail

ArchiveTeam ArchiveBot/20140807.01 (wpull 0.37a1) and not Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/36.0.1985.125 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/bots/generic.yaml
yesArchiveBot Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesArchiveBotBot/Crawler0.006 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 36.0.1985.125closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 36.0.1985.125closeWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.19502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 36.0.1985.125closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesArchiveTeam ArchiveBotclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 36.0.1985.125closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.06001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 36.0.1985.125WebKit 537.36Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41104 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesArchiveBotclose0.014 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 36.0.1985.125closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 8.0closeFedora Desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:20 | by ThaDafinser