User agent detail

Opera/7.54 (Windows NT 5.1; U) [pl]
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-295.php
Opera 7.54WinXP 5.11.0 unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 7.54Presto 1.0WinXP 5.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.01 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 7.54closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 7.54closeWindows 5.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.22202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 7.54Presto Windows XPdesktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 7.54closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 7.54closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 7.54closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.041 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 7.54 Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.46005 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 7.54 Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 7.54closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 7.54closeWindows XPDesktopcloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:19 | by ThaDafinser