User agent detail

MOT-E825/03.0F.01. MIB/BER2.2 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
MotorolaE825 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Motorola Internet Browser 2.2 MotorolaE825Mobile Phoneyes0.009 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MOT-E825 03.0F.01.closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Motorola Internet Browser close MotorolaE825mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
MotorolaE825smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close MotorolaE825closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
MIB close closecloseclosecloseclose0.05401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
No result found
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Motorola Internet Browser MotorolaE825mobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close MotorolaE825Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.034 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:19 | by ThaDafinser