User agent detail

JUC (Linux; U; 2.3.6; zh-cn; SAMSUNG-SGH-I577; 480*800) UCWEB7.9.0.94/139/444
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungSGH-I577 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 7.9WebKit Android 2.3Mobile Phoneyesyes0.007 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
JUC closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser closeLinux mobile-browseryescloseclose0.25602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 7.9 GNU/Linux SamsungSGH-I577smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 7.9.0closeAndroid 2.3.6SamsungSGH-I577closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 7.9.0.94closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.046 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 7.9.0.94 Linux Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 7.9 Android 2.3.6SamsungGalaxy Exhilaratemobile:smartyescloseclose0.037 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 2.3closeAndroid 2.3Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:19 | by ThaDafinser