User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 7_1_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/537.51.2 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile/11D201 Twitter for iPhone
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-234.php
Twitter App 0.0iOS 7.1unknown AppleiPhoneMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Twitter App WebKit iOS 7.1AppleiPhoneMobile Phoneyesyes0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 537.51.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari closeiOS 7.1.1AppleiPhonemobile-browseryescloseclose0.18602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Mobile Safari WebKit iOS 7.1AppleiPhonesmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0closeiOS 7.1.1closeiPhonecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Mobile Safari UIWebView 7.1.1closeiOS 7.1.1AppleiPhonecloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeiPhone OS 7.1.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.06501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
WebKit 537.51.2iOS 7.1.1AppleiPhonecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 537.51.2iOS 7.1.1AppleiPhonemobile:smartyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Webview closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Mobile Safari 7.0closeiOS 7.1AppleiPhoneSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:18 | by ThaDafinser