User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (OS/2; Warp 4.5; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-os2.yaml
Firefox 4.0.1OS/2 Warp 4.5Gecko 2.0.1desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox 4.0Gecko 2.0OS/2 Desktop0.023 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 4.0.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 4.0.1closeOS/2 desktop-browsercloseclose0.17502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 4.0Gecko OS/2 desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 4.0.1close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 4.0.1close closeclosecloseclose0.013 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 4.0.1closeOS/2 closecloseclosecloseclose0.047 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Warpzilla 4.0.1Gecko 20100101OS/2 Warp closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.47205 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 4.0.1Gecko 2.0.1OS/2 Warp 4.5desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 4.0.1closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Firefox 4.0.1closeMac OS X 10.6Desktopcloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:18 | by ThaDafinser