User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (Linux mips; U; HbbTV/1.1.1 (; Humax; iCord HD+; 1.0.0; 1.0.0; ); ce-html/1.0; en) Presto/2.10.250 Version/11.60
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/tv.yml
Opera 11.60GNU/Linux Presto HumaxiCord HD+tv Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 11.60Presto 2.10Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.007 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 11.60closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 11.60closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.19602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 11.60Presto GNU/Linux HumaxiCord HD+tv0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 11.60closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
HbbTV 1.1.1closeLinux HumaxiCord HD+closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 11.60closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.08501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 11.60Presto 2.10.250Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Devices 3.2Presto 2.10.250 HumaxiCord HD+ Digital Receivertelevisioncloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 11.60closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.007 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:18 | by ThaDafinser