User agent detail

MQQBrowser/2.2(KQB22_GA;Nokia2700c/09.97)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Nokia2700c Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.038 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MQQBrowser 2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
QQbrowser 2.2close mobile-browseryescloseclose0.20202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
QQ Browser 2.2 Symbian Nokia2700csmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia Browser 09.97)closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
QQ Browser Mobile 2.2close Nokia2700ccloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
QQ Browser 2.2 NokiaOS NokiaNokia 2700ccloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.53405 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
QQ Browser 2.2 Series40 Nokia2700 classicmobile:featureyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:18 | by ThaDafinser