User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Intel Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/538.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/538.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/camouflage.yaml
Safari OS X Webkit 538.1desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Safari WebKit MacOSX 10AppleMacintoshDesktop0.037 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 538.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 538.1closeOS X desktop-browsercloseclose0.18802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari WebKit Mac desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari closeOS X closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari closeMac OS X closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeOS X closecloseclosecloseclose0.05401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari WebKit 538.1Mac OS X closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Safari Webkit 538.1OS X desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:17 | by ThaDafinser