User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; nl-nl) AppleWebKit/523.12 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.0.4 Safari/523.12
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-318.php
Safari 3.0MacOSX 10unknown AppleMacintoshDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Safari 3.0WebKit MacOSX 10AppleMacintoshDesktop0.018 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 3.0.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 3.0.4closeOS X desktop-browsercloseclose0.18802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari 3.0WebKit Mac desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 3.0.4closeOS X closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari 3.0.4closeMac OS X closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari 3.0.4closeOS X closecloseclosecloseclose0.048 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari 3.0.4WebKit 523.12Mac OS X closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Safari 3.0.4Webkit 523.12OS X desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 3.0.4closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 3.0.4closeMac OS X Desktopcloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:16 | by ThaDafinser