User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD; U; Viera; xx; ja-jp) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) Viera/2.0.0 DIGAPlus/1.0.0 Safari/534.30
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/television/panasonic.yaml
Viera Browser 2.0.0 Webkit 534.30PanasonicVieratelevision Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 534.30closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 534.30closeBSD desktop-browsercloseclose0.18702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Safari WebKit FreeBSD PanasonicSmart TVtv0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari closeFreeBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari closeFreeBSD closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeFreeBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0.04701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari WebKit 534.30FreeBSD closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Viera Browser 2.0.0Webkit 534.30 PanasonicVieratelevisioncloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:16 | by ThaDafinser