User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.4.2; LG-D801 Build/KOT49I.D80120a) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/37.0.2062.76 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/browser-chrome.yaml
Chrome 37Android 4.4.2Blink 537.36LGG2mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 37.0Blink Android 4.4Mobile Phoneyesyes0.025 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 37.0.2062.76closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 37.0.2062.76closeAndroid 4.4.2LGD801mobile-browseryescloseclose0.25903 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 37.0Blink Android 4.4LGD801smartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 37.0.2062.76closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 37.0.2062closeAndroid 4.4.2LGD801closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.05701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 37.0.2062.76WebKit 537.36Android 4.4.2LGLGD801closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 37Blink Android 4.4.2LGG2mobile:smartyescloseclose0.021 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 37.0.2062.76closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 37closeAndroid 4.4LGD801Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.088 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:16 | by ThaDafinser