User agent detail

NANaverNDrive/3.0.0(Android OS 4.2.2;samsung SHV-E300L)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungSHV-E300L Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesNaverBotBot/Crawler0.034 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
NANaverNDrive 3.0.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid SamsungGalaxy S4mobile-browseryescloseclose0.28003 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.2SamsungSHV-E300Lsmartphoneyes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeAndroid SamsungSHV-E300Lcloseclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Stock Android Browser Android Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Android SamsungGalaxy S4mobile:smartyescloseclose0.029 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android 3.6closeAndroid 3.6Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.051 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:15 | by ThaDafinser