User agent detail

Nokia300/5.0 (06.97) Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/420+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/420+
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/manufacturer-nokia-series40.yaml
Series40 Webkit 420NokiaAsha 300mobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 420closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 420close desktop-browsercloseclose0.19002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia Browser WebKit Symbian Nokia300smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia Browser 5.0closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia Services (WAP) Browser close Nokia300closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.06301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari WebKit 420NokiaOS NokiaNokia 300closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 420Series40 NokiaAsha 300mobile:featureyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close NokiaAsha 300Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:15 | by ThaDafinser