User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:5.0.0.3) Whistler/20110021 myibrow/5.0.0.3 (Firefox/7.0 Gecko/000 compatible)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-712.php
My Internet Browser 5.0Win7 6.1unknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
My Internet Browser 5.0Gecko Win7 6.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.054 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 7.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
My Internet Browser 5.0.0.3closeWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.19202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 7.0Gecko Windows 7desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 7.0closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 7.0closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.019 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
myibrow 5.0.0.3closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.049 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 7.0Gecko Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 7.0Gecko 5.0.0Windows 7desktopcloseclose0.01 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 7.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Firefox 7.0closeWindows 7Desktopcloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:15 | by ThaDafinser