User agent detail

LG/KC910i/V10a Browser/Obigo-Q7.1 MMS/LG-MMS-V1.0/1.2 MediaPlayer/LGPlayer/1.0 Java/ASVM/1.1 Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-feature.yaml
Obigo Q 7.1 LGKC910i Renoirmobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Teleca-Obigo 7.0 JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.031 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
LG KC910icloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Obigo closeJVM LGKC910imobile-browseryescloseclose0.17902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Obigo LGKC910ismartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Obigo 7.1close LGKC910icloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
close closeclosecloseclosecloseyesJavaCrawler0.05101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Obigo Browser LGLGMMScloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Obigo Q 7.1 LGKC910i Renoirmobile:featureyescloseclose0.009 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close LGKC910iFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.021 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:15 | by ThaDafinser