User agent detail

SubStream/0.7 CFNetwork/485.12.30 Darwin/10.4.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/unknown.yml
SubStream 0.7iOS 4.2 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
CFNetwork WebKit iOS 4.2AppleMobile Deviceyesyes0.018 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SubStream 0.7closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
SubStream 0.7closeMac OS media-playercloseclose0.24202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
SubStream 0.7 iOS 4.2yes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
CFNetwork 485.12.30closeiOS 4Applecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Darwin closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
SubStream 0.7 iOS 4.2.8mobile:smartyescloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Mobile Safari 4.2closeiOS 4.2AppleiPhoneSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:14 | by ThaDafinser