User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (F07B;FOMA;like Gecko)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
DoCoMoF07B Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
closeMOAP(S) FujitsuF07Bmobile-browseryescloseclose0.17702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
No result found
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close DoCoMoF07Bcloseclosecloseclose0.014 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Mozilla close closecloseclosecloseclose0.05301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 5.0 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose3.41034 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
MOAP(S) FujitsuF07Bmobile:featureyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
docomo F07Bcloseclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close DoCoMoF704iFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.051 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:14 | by ThaDafinser