User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.1; NONE Build/JOP40D) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/41.0.2272.63 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
Chrome 41.0Android 4.2unknown unknowngeneral Mobile PhoneMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 41.0Blink Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.027 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 41.0.2272.63closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 41.0.2272.63closeAndroid 4.2.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.28103 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 41.0Blink Android 4.2tabletyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 41.0.2272.63closeAndroid 4.2.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 41.0.2272closeAndroid 4.2.1NONEcloseclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.047 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 41.0.2272.63WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 41Blink Android 4.2.1NONEtabletyescloseclose0.07501 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 41.0.2272.63closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 42closeAndroid 4.2Tabletyesyescloseclose0.026 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:28:14 | by ThaDafinser